Talk Sense

Message from the editors

Disclaimer: Please note that the content on this site is for informational and entertainment purposes only and should not be taken as anything else such as qualified professional advice. Anyone on this site seeking any advice should consult a qualified professional. This site's owner/creators cannot vouch for the veracity of the content on this site and are not liable for any risks or issues associated with using or acting upon the information on this site.

Discussion #10713Talk Sense

27 Jun 2014 09:43:53
when will we find out the whole truth about our past?

 

Not Registered
yes, it appears that our solar system was different in the past to what we've been told. Below is a video from the electric universe proponents, narrated by David Talbot, which shows it was different, if you can get to the end of the video as it's a bit slow to begin with.

Symbols of an Alien Sky

Agree · 3 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #9153Talk Sense

26 Jun 2014 10:14:24
the star child skull is not human.

 

Not Registered
I agree.

Ryan.
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
Didn't the DNA analysis find he was human though?

Ryan.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
frankyscouser
Think it was inconclusive had part human and unknown dna, hybrid?
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
xXJediXx
I watched a doc on it before was part human and inconclusive dna pal
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
{Ed033's Note - Maybe all except frankyscouser above should watch the below 2 videos to get up to speed (to 2010) on the Starchild skull

Lloyd Pye short video on the Starchild skull




Starchild Skull 2010 DNA Result

Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0

Read all 8 replies

Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #10712Talk Sense

25 Jun 2014 23:22:27
I just wanted to go back to something comrade editor 001 said on the cannabis thread further down regards the cia involvement in the drug trade. They have massive involvement in the trade. That's why they pushed for involvement in Afghanistan in the 80s (look at the problems that caused). That's what they were doing in Indochina in the 70s. Never mind some pizdet about fighting communism. Their involvement was protecting their investment. And of course it made certain families rich from selling all that military hardware as a collateral sideline. Why do you think they've always had such an influence in south America.

Kim Philby

 

{Ed001's Note - I saw a few blogs by UN service personnel in Afghanistan about how they would go into a village to give out seeds for the villagers to grow, so they no longer relied on opium to survive. They would go back a few months later to find that the CIA had been back in to provide them with more opium seeds and got rid of the food seeds they had been given! The whole invasion of Afghanistan was orchestrated because the Taliban destroyed the opium fields.}
Not Registered
25 Jun 2014 23:36:03
Exactly. Back in the 80s they feared the Red Army over running their poppy fields so ploughed funding into the mujahedeen, including one Osama bin Laden. After the soviet withdrawal they relaxed and ignored what they had created. 12 years after the wall came down the Taliban were eradicating the poppy fields so they needed a reason to go back to Afghanistan to save the poppy fields again this time from their own creation. So when they did 911 the afghans and friends became a convenient scapegoat. And in go the troops on operation save the poppy. And a decade later business is booming. Although this is not to say that Islamic terrorism is not a serious threat but it makes one good scapegoat. Rather like blaming communists for the Reichstag fire.

Look at what they did in Vietnam for the drugs trade.

Kim Philby
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #9152Talk Sense

25 Jun 2014 12:27:33
yes I have watched the ripple effect, pity it will never be on mainstream tv.

 

Not Registered
{Ed033's Note - If you haven't seen 7/7 Ripple Effect about the 7/7 London Bombings

Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
HERBIE
If any of you have not watched this yet please do so. So much evidence that this was all set up, it baffles the hell out of me how our dictators/govenment have not been brought to justice, so many mistakes was made by them but brushed aside and ignored.
I was physically shaking with anger by the the end.
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
{Ed033's Note - If you want to see an extended version of the above 7/7 Ripple Effect film that includes the above video and a whole lot more evidence please watch this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwyzpzEgUWE
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #9844Talk Sense

24 Jun 2014 21:58:52
Cannabis Oil - is this true?

The US Government has known since 1974 that Cannabis cures Cancer. In '72 Richard Nixon wanted a larger budget for his war on drugs. He thought that if he proved Cannabis caused lung cancer like cigarettes do, he would get the support he needed. He gave the Medical College of Virginia 2 years to do a study on the effects of THC on the body. In '74 the study was completed. It turns out, THC when ingested in highly concentrated forms (such as eating Cannabis oil) will attack any mutated cells in your body while strengthening and rejuvenating the healthy cells. They found the PERFECT cure for Cancer. It worked fast, it worked well, it worked on many different forms of Cancer in ALL stages and it had ZERO harmful side effects. (Unlike Chemo which deteriorates your entire body and kills 1 in 5 patients) Not only that, but it dissolves ALL forms of tumors and can even combat superbugs like MRSA. When Richard Nixon saw the results of the study he was FURIOUS. He threw the entire report in the trash and deemed the study classified. In 1976 President Gerald Ford put an end to all public cannabis research and granted exclusive research rights to major pharmaceutical companies, who set out - unsuccessfully - to develop synthetic forms of THC that would deliver all the medical benefits without the "high. "

We only found out about the study a few years ago thanks to dedicated medical and law professionals who filed Freedom of Information Requests. The Govt lied for many reasons. One of the main reasons is Pharmaceutical Companies. They spend billions every year lobbying to keep Cannabis illegal because they make TRILLIONS off Cancer drugs and research. They are already well aware that Cannabis cures Cancer. (They can't legally patent a 15,000 year old plant) They have a great con going at the moment. Cancer patients and their loved ones will spend their entire life savings or even sell their houses and businesses in order to pay for Chemotherapy and other Cancer treatment drugs. a lot of the time they spend all that money and their loved one dies anyway. If the public found out that the Govt has been lying for over 40 years, that MILLIONS of lives could have been saved and that the dying could grow the cure they need in their backyard. The public would be going nuts over it.

 

{Ed033's Note - Run From the Cure - The Rick Simpson Story video
(showing what the THC oil is, its benefits with testimonials and how to make the THC oil.)

Not Registered
I couldn't agree more with your post len bright, it is well researched and the conclusion you came to resonates true with me as well.

A friend has had various tumors and reoccurring cancer for a while now. However, I have been finding it extremely difficult to even convince them to give cannabis a chance.

The establishment propaganda has thoroughly incapacitated some people's analytical processes. When one prefers to poison their body, to the point of death, through chemo-poisoning than use a natural herb, it saddens to say the least.
zari
{Ed033's Note - More on treating cancer from Dr. Bob Beck below.

If you watch the below video presentation by Bob Beck, then you might want to watch the Beck protocols explained by Chris Hyslop of goodvitality.com where you could buy a Beck device in UK.

Chris Hyslop explaining Beck protocols
http://comsci.org.uk/products/becksZapper/BecksYouTubes.htm

Suppressed Medical Discovery Dr Robert Beck on cancer and his device

Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
frankyscouser
I have no idea if weed can help with cancer but I do know it helps my mum with arthritis and I find it astounding that so called normal cigarettes are legal when they will not admit to name all of the ingredients yet a natural herb that has been used since we have walked this earth they chose to ban, well you do the maths.
Agree · 3 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
Very good post Len. Getting friends to consider other forms of treatment is a very difficult and delicate conversation Zari. Thanks for the vids Ed033. Nicely summed up Franky.

Ryan.
{Ed001's Note - the problem with all this cannabis stuff I have is this, where is all this 'freedom of information' documentation? If it is so helpful, which is perfectly plausible, where are the links to the documents involved so we can all read them? The only things I have ever seen are cannabis users saying it helped them, without any real idea of whether it was the cannabis or something else that achieved the desired result. A good friend of mine has recently had stomach cancer, from which he is now in remission, but he was a cannabis user, and he would smoke it in significant quantities, on a daily basis. Whether that was because he only used to use what was homegrown, by himself or friends, rather than resin based or whatever, it certainly didn't stop him developing an extremely dangerous tumour.

As for arthritis Franky, it does not cure the disease, simply covers up the pain. Similar to most western medicine, it is a treatment for the symptoms, not the causes.

In my personal opinion there are a number of reasons for it staying illegal, not those given. One it allows the CIA to make illicit money off it, similar to the way they do with cocaine and heroine. Secondly it is a very good soporific, which can cause inaction. Useful if you want to control a population and stop them actually getting off their backside and acting.

While I am not ruling out the benefits of THC, I would doubt that the wild claims being made are true. It is more likely that it does have some medicinal benefits, which are being hidden by drugs manufacturers, but that they are nothing like as strong as the claims. It seems to be as much about cannabis users trying to give their usage legitimacy, as it is about anything else.}
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
I don't think your meant to smoke the oil but digest it
{Ed033's Note - yes, digest the THC oil. This is not the hemp oil you can buy. It's important if you're interested in the THC oil to watch the Run From the Cure - The Rick Simpson Story video above on what the THC oil is, its benefits with testimonials and how to make the THC oil.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
I've just clicked 'Disagree' on my own post : (

Ryan.
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0

Read all 14 replies

Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #10711Talk Sense

24 Jun 2014 21:16:34
Haven't been on a while, but just popped in my head, in history Egypt were the dominant at one point, so was the Romans and so was the Greek. Atm its the americqns/ English. is this history's way of sayin its time for change. String possibility of middle east imo. quatari money + oil and opium in afghan and the strong fear in the street of a Muslim takeover?

Gemmell 1888

 

Geordiesteve
To a certain extent you are correct, the civilisations mentioned, along with other such as Mogol, Ottoman, Persian and so on fell for one of a few reasons. Either they over-stretched and spread themselves too thin, someone bigger and badder came along to subjugate them or an external force came along, such as religion (Roman empire fell as many of their soldiers converted from Mithraism to Christianity), the Ottoman Empire fell because Christianity expanded in search of more followers, not solely due to being conquered. The shift in religious spread is more worrying than invasion at this moment, in my opinion we are heading for another 'Crusades', if they haven't already begun. If you consider the amount of conflict that begins because of religion then we are already there.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
Honestly, I think it's the same "empire". The priesthood has been suppressing freedom of thought since later Egypt and its "rule" books have been in existence since Rome.
They regularly change names and religions but their actions, words, clothing and hats can be traced back through history.

That establishment has been draining Africa and the middle east for resources since they left that area.
I cannot see them returning to it in the near future, as they have been using it to destabilize that greater region.
How would they reed themselves of all the brainwashed "crusaders" they created?

I see them moving their capital to Hong Kong. They have been preparing the city and surrounding areas for a while. Opium wars, Mao's cultural decimation, covert occupation etc. They have already moved the centers of many of their global-reaching corporations there already.
Additionally, they have publicly admitted that the "great chinese experiment" has been a great success and should be promoted as the new way of governance. Kissinger, Rockefeller and Nixon said that as many times as they could.
Capitalism with a totalitarian overtone seems to be the flavor of the future, for the non-sovereigns.
zari
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Geordiesteve
An interesting take on an supreme being ruling class is Danielle Trussoni's Angelology books. Although I tend to give book like this a wide berth, I found it well researched and engaging AND if you replace the angelic race mentioned (along with all the biblical subterfuge) with ETs then it could be a plausible suggestion.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
25 Jun 2014 23:07:47
I agree with Zari, it will be the Chinese century. With Russia a strong supporter. Just look at how Putin has been changing the system from yeltsins version of America over to something nearer the Chinese version.

Kim Philby
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
25 Jun 2014 23:38:02
Zari I would be interested on further explanation of what you say.

Kim Philby
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

Read all 6 replies

Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #10710Talk Sense

24 Jun 2014 19:00:14
re the posts about 911 and the numerous possibilities of how it was enacted, I think one of the eds posted a link a while ago of a presentation by a woman (helpfully vague) about the use of black tech's like microwave and anti gravity weapons. Also that one of the 911 truth scientists worked for reagan on star wars so some of it may be disinformation.

My main reason for posting though is I have just recently read a book about venetian oligarchs/ black nobility, their ties to/ creation of english system and their roots in byzantine and babylonian empires, their involvement in freemasonry, illuminism and the hermetica trismegistus and the misinterpretation of the life/death metaphor for power maintenance.

Lots of vids try tie the nwo/illuminati/kabbalism/occultism together and whilst I think some of it is christian propaganda there clearly is ties to elitists and death cults, just wondering what peoples opinions are on whether you believe this sort of thing and also whether you believe that occultism is real/has an affect

 

Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #2031Talk Sense

24 Jun 2014 06:06:19
http://gizmodo.com/inside-the-disaster-housing-nyc-is-testing-for-city-eme-1592805305

Link for an article regarding 'stacked emergency shelter' in NYC. Is this me reading too much into things or is this Agenda 21 in motion?

AngryChef

 

Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #10709Talk Sense

23 Jun 2014 19:23:07
{Ed033's Note - US Embassy in Berlin offering cash for propaganda

http://tinyurl.com/kszhlcu

 

Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #9151Talk Sense

22 Jun 2014 12:09:04
no I do not think we evolved from apes, I have stated I think we were created by a greater being{no god}

 

Not Registered
Can I just thank Ed033 for sharing the Lloyd pye video the other day. Found it interesting and it very much opened my mind on a subject I knew nothing about. Still a newbie to it so not sure why my opinion is right now but I can recommend the video to anyone who has not seen it.

Harold
{Ed033's Note - Ok thanks, Harold. If anyone else wants to see it, it's below.

Lloyd Pye video presentation on our human origins.

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
I believe we did evolve from Apes, way to many similarities/charachteristics between the the 2 for us not to be related somehow.
{Ed033's Note - I guess you haven't watched the Lloyd Pye video above showing the problems with us evolving from apes and an alternative theory. At the moment in order to explain the problems with us evolving from apes, we're left with a theory that humans we're genetically tinkered with.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
HERBIE
No not watched it yet but will do later, its not a topic I've delved into much but but we got to look at alternatives.
{Ed033's Note - Here's the problem we all have. As we're all lied to about everything, if any of us agree with anything that comes out of government, church, mainstream media, mainstream science, mainstream schooling, it's almost certainly wrong, so therefore we have to at least look at alternatives as you said.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Theorist
Either way we didn't evolve from apes we were always our own species we shared a common ancestor, same way any of us do with our cousins we aren't the same family but we're are related
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
HERBIE
Good watch Ed, certainly an eye opener. The missing link and timescale between the 2 deffinately makes you think along the lines of genetic modification somewhere.
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #10708Talk Sense

21 Jun 2014 23:04:14
Just watched Edge of Darkness with Mel Gibson and basically the story is about a private company that is making nuclear weapons with foreign imported parts, so if it was ever to be used on American or allies soil. and they traced it back, it would look like it was from the enemy.

Anyone think this is happening in real life? i'm pretty sure it is.

 

Not Registered
Thought more people would have responded to this tbh.
Agree · 3 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #9150Talk Sense

21 Jun 2014 13:46:55
i believe there is life on mars one way or another.

 

Not Registered
There is water and oxygen on Mars, so it's not unreasonable to think there might be life of some sort.

Ryan.
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Create a new post

Log in or register to post.

Create New Post

Create New Post

Please log in to create a new post.

Posts appear after editor approval.