Latest replies

Ummm, why can't they all be right. Each one of those scenarios could produce UFOs.

I can't think of any reasons why can't it be all of the above?

Mars was once like Earth and one day Earth will be like Mars. Mars became barren as a result of radiation from the sun and solar flares pelting the surface for thousands of years, the reason the radiation was let through was due to Mars' weak magnetic field which is now close to non-existent.

The 'face' found on Mars is nothing more than a small cluster of hills photographed when the sun was shining on them at a funny angle. It is human nature to identify faces or shapes in everyday ordinary objects or, in this case, land formations. Not some sort of monument built by ancient creatures.

Martin

Cunnninnnnnnggg....

Raz

Thanks Jay, just seems its likes these ancient religions. scribes whatever tried to communicate what they knew in terms that they understand and thousands of years later people take what they said too literal rather than looking at what they said.

I'm not buying the smokescreen theory, not saying your wrong just that it doesn't make sense to me. Saddam had spent most of the 90's sailing close to the wind with regards to breaching UN resolutions, Clinton was close a cpouple of times to going back in. In 2001 he was clearly in breach of the 1991 resolutions its just the the UN is so corrupt and spineless they didn't have the balls to enforce them.

Here's a conspiracy for you, just because we didn't find any wmd doesn't mean something never existed in the first place. We know for a fact he had gas and wasn't afraid of using it. Look at the cocktail of drugs the troops were given back in 1991.

Apparently there is water on the moon and the canyons open and close which is impossible seeing that their the same size as the grand canyon plus the face on which has teeth and pupils so its not a trick of the light and also 3 pyramids which match up to the egyptian pyramids in size and positioning so if it is uninhabited now it was not always like that


MJ

It may have been habitable once, i did read a book that suggested that it was before a massive catacylsm stripped the atmosphere away.

I take it then that you think the so called face and pyramids is just a trick of the light then?

Religion should be about spirituality not a money spinner for certain sects plus if religion was perfect no idiots would war against others...

MJ

No idea mate. That's why I enjoy reading this stuff. maybe it was aliens or the American goverment......its usually down to one if them two.....
Matty b

Has to have been built as there were wooden platforms, coconut fibre found, and the tunnels to let in the water from the sea. Could just be a very old practicle joke, or something really exciting, I'm sure we will find out one day.

Ash

I personally believe that there is no way that it is naturally made. The fact that there are layers at different depths of different materials lead me to believe that it was human made.

Also to the person who said, how can you hide something deeper than you can dig! Surely they would have dug the main hole first, hid whatever is down there, filled the hole back up again and then created the flood tunnels to stop anyone from getting down to whatever is there.

TB

Mikey you have missed my point regarding the steel. No scientist or structural engineer were allowed investigate steel from any of the builings which collapsed. I'm not disputing the extreme temperatures did have an effect on the towers. However, your agrument does not stand up when compared to the colapse of WTC7. Yes this may have been damaged by falling debris and was aflame on some floors, but, this cannot explain the the demolition style collapse of tower 7. I look forward to your explanation for this particular buildings freefall into it's own imprint.

MickQ

Ash, good point.

I do not think it was built, I think it is geographical, the whole area is covered in caves and sink holes. That said, it is a good smokescreen. Maybe I should stop commenting, I need to read more!

Raz

It was first found in 1800 how could it have been the Nazis?

Ash

Wow, both of those appeared fine. I have been using the footy rumours pages for a few months and they never appear...

Raz

Wow! If you want to believe every piece of information that the news feeds you then that is on your watch ItsNotRocketScience. I am a scientist and look for evidence, motive, facts. There were a great many things about the american administration (bush snr, chaney, rumsfeld, rice etc.) at the time that didn't add up in terms of their reactions and their private financial actions in the months leading up to and after the "attacks". But of course it is always easier for folk like you to dismiss it as conspiracy theory rather than actually sit down and read about the facts before mouthing off. Do some research! s1280

Nobody's refuting that fact It'sNotRocketScience - but who are the terrorists?

Haha nice one Raz!

Azza

No mate I will investigate!

Raz

Ps. Eds- have you any idea why my exclamation marks do not work? Is it a google chrome thing? Here's one : !

Peace. {Ed001's Note - I have no idea, the browser you are using shouldn't affect it.}