24 Feb 2020 21:49:20
Sorry for what, Southampton? .
In seeking the truth, I haven't found the answers. It's just made me see the lies.
Latest replies
24 Feb 2020 23:25:25
That's it ed33.
Read discussionThat's it ed33.
24 Feb 2020 20:07:14
Agree Ed gravity must be cleaver because like others have said.
It knows the difference between air and helium in a ballon lol.
Also when u thought ahh I just dropped the remote,
It actually got pull out of your hand.
And if u ever want to go sky diving u will be pull to earth not fall .
I do agree atmosphere next to vacuum is near impossible.
But I'm still sat on a painfull fence sorry SM and ed.
Read discussionAgree Ed gravity must be cleaver because like others have said.
It knows the difference between air and helium in a ballon lol.
Also when u thought ahh I just dropped the remote,
It actually got pull out of your hand.
And if u ever want to go sky diving u will be pull to earth not fall .
I do agree atmosphere next to vacuum is near impossible.
But I'm still sat on a painfull fence sorry SM and ed.
24 Feb 2020 19:17:02
Haha, subjective gravity. Don't give 'them' ideas, Ed.
The Michelson-Morley experiment explanation is a joke.
Actually, the same person I spoke to about the vacuum / pressurised atmosphere, I explained the M-M experiment to them. They looked perplexed. Not from the fact they didn't understand what I had explained. More the fact they couldn't compute what the experiment concludes because it goes against their programming.
It's frustrating not being able to talk to intellectuals that are boxed in by MSBS thought.
But it's great when you see you have got through to them, on some level.
Read discussionHaha, subjective gravity. Don't give 'them' ideas, Ed.
The Michelson-Morley experiment explanation is a joke.
Actually, the same person I spoke to about the vacuum / pressurised atmosphere, I explained the M-M experiment to them. They looked perplexed. Not from the fact they didn't understand what I had explained. More the fact they couldn't compute what the experiment concludes because it goes against their programming.
It's frustrating not being able to talk to intellectuals that are boxed in by MSBS thought.
But it's great when you see you have got through to them, on some level.
24 Feb 2020 17:20:56
I really can not get my head around how a pressurised atmosphere and a vacuum can sit side by side with no barrier separating them. It just wouldn't work.
I have had discussions where people argue that the air thins and gradually turns to a vacuum, all held in place by gravity.
If gravity was holding the air in place, how is it we get different layers of clouds moving in different direction?
Read discussionI really can not get my head around how a pressurised atmosphere and a vacuum can sit side by side with no barrier separating them. It just wouldn't work.
I have had discussions where people argue that the air thins and gradually turns to a vacuum, all held in place by gravity.
If gravity was holding the air in place, how is it we get different layers of clouds moving in different direction?
24 Feb 2020 08:29:07
Hi again Southampton just a follow on firstly the long earth by prattchet is a work of fiction but isn’t all fiction twists and based on reality whatever that is . Also search time slip Liverpool bold street by Tom Slemen, who has collected a number of accounts of this phenomenon. Anyway hope you in enjoy the book . Keep your mind open
Big C.
Read discussionHi again Southampton just a follow on firstly the long earth by prattchet is a work of fiction but isn’t all fiction twists and based on reality whatever that is . Also search time slip Liverpool bold street by Tom Slemen, who has collected a number of accounts of this phenomenon. Anyway hope you in enjoy the book . Keep your mind open
Big C.
24 Feb 2020 09:46:01
No problem SM
Nothing wrong with being put right mate
Cheers.
Read discussionNo problem SM
Nothing wrong with being put right mate
Cheers.
23 Feb 2020 22:02:52
I did think it would be a big step watching this, for someone that hadn't look into Our ancient petrified past before. But hoped it would spark a few to think about it. As you say, this is obviously petrified biological matter.
I don't believe he is nuts. But I suspect the people who do, think the same about us, Ed, and are probably on the wrong page.
Read discussionI did think it would be a big step watching this, for someone that hadn't look into Our ancient petrified past before. But hoped it would spark a few to think about it. As you say, this is obviously petrified biological matter.
I don't believe he is nuts. But I suspect the people who do, think the same about us, Ed, and are probably on the wrong page.
23 Feb 2020 23:20:48
Ok.
Read discussionOk.
23 Feb 2020 23:23:18
Alright big c.
If I come across evidence to back your theory ill post it .
Till then ill read the long earth.
Read discussionAlright big c.
If I come across evidence to back your theory ill post it .
Till then ill read the long earth.
24 Feb 2020 00:24:42
"Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality. " - Nikola Tesla.
Read discussion"Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality. " - Nikola Tesla.
24 Feb 2020 00:21:37
I may not be right, Southampton, but I think you are incorrect. Sorry :)
A rocket is basically a controlled explosion over a period of time.
To me the force is happening inside the rocket as the fuel escapes, it doesn't need the escaping fuel to push on something to make it move because there are internal forces at play, which make the rocket move.
Remember that we are told space is a vacuum. A vacuum will not hinder the result of internal forces and this will create a directional movement directly related to where the force originated. Therefor a controlled forward movement in relation to a rocket.
Read discussionI may not be right, Southampton, but I think you are incorrect. Sorry :)
A rocket is basically a controlled explosion over a period of time.
To me the force is happening inside the rocket as the fuel escapes, it doesn't need the escaping fuel to push on something to make it move because there are internal forces at play, which make the rocket move.
Remember that we are told space is a vacuum. A vacuum will not hinder the result of internal forces and this will create a directional movement directly related to where the force originated. Therefor a controlled forward movement in relation to a rocket.
23 Feb 2020 21:04:47
Hi Southampton I was putting forward an alternative reality and if one is valid then all must be until proven otherwise, I like my theory of infinite flat discs each belonging to a different time and if you think about it, it would meet with your flat earth theory but also proffers an opportunity to move through time and would make ghosts and people seeing Victorian streets Scenes in Liverpool Bold Street.
Also if you haven’t read the Long Earth by terry pratchett I would recommend giving it a go
Big C.
Read discussionHi Southampton I was putting forward an alternative reality and if one is valid then all must be until proven otherwise, I like my theory of infinite flat discs each belonging to a different time and if you think about it, it would meet with your flat earth theory but also proffers an opportunity to move through time and would make ghosts and people seeing Victorian streets Scenes in Liverpool Bold Street.
Also if you haven’t read the Long Earth by terry pratchett I would recommend giving it a go
Big C.
23 Feb 2020 18:21:53
I found the original footage interview to try and see if the translation is right. YT's translator just starts to spurt out random words because there is Russian being translated into Hungarian and vice-versa. None of it made sense. The word space did pop up though. haha
I was going to give up then I saw a comment from a Hungarian who went on to translate the interview. I have know idea if it is correct, but what is said I felt worthy of passing on.
Translation comment form YT:
"The more I listen to it, the more it is indeed like he is trying to subtly say he wasn't been into space. The interviewer last minutes as finale asks him whether he believes in aliens (22 25 min) and he responds "What does it mean whether I believe? They just exist. And by the way our aryan civilization is the only one who came to Earth from outer space". Then the interviewer says "In this train of thought, maybe when you were in space, extrodinary things have happened! " on which the austronaut answers (23 02 min) "How could I know? Might have happened, but no one said anything to me. "
After this the interviewer says "Igor Petrovich, there seem to be some kind of stange code between all austronauts to not speak on this topic very openly. " on which he responds (23 24 min) "No, nothing like that. We just do not have the time. Everything I know I am ready to say in the next 30 minutes if I need to".
The interviewer then says "Since we do not have 30 more minutes, I will leave this door wide open, and I want to thank you that you admitted the existence of alien life form, after all you are hero of Solviet Union and we can trust you! "
On which he in closing words says a bit nerviously "Look, I said the code of honor isn't stopping the austronauts from talking about what is happening in space. They just do not know. In fact we haven't been into space. If anyone says otherwise it is not true. "
Basically with that the interview ends. "
Read discussionI found the original footage interview to try and see if the translation is right. YT's translator just starts to spurt out random words because there is Russian being translated into Hungarian and vice-versa. None of it made sense. The word space did pop up though. haha
I was going to give up then I saw a comment from a Hungarian who went on to translate the interview. I have know idea if it is correct, but what is said I felt worthy of passing on.
Translation comment form YT:
"The more I listen to it, the more it is indeed like he is trying to subtly say he wasn't been into space. The interviewer last minutes as finale asks him whether he believes in aliens (22 25 min) and he responds "What does it mean whether I believe? They just exist. And by the way our aryan civilization is the only one who came to Earth from outer space". Then the interviewer says "In this train of thought, maybe when you were in space, extrodinary things have happened! " on which the austronaut answers (23 02 min) "How could I know? Might have happened, but no one said anything to me. "
After this the interviewer says "Igor Petrovich, there seem to be some kind of stange code between all austronauts to not speak on this topic very openly. " on which he responds (23 24 min) "No, nothing like that. We just do not have the time. Everything I know I am ready to say in the next 30 minutes if I need to".
The interviewer then says "Since we do not have 30 more minutes, I will leave this door wide open, and I want to thank you that you admitted the existence of alien life form, after all you are hero of Solviet Union and we can trust you! "
On which he in closing words says a bit nerviously "Look, I said the code of honor isn't stopping the austronauts from talking about what is happening in space. They just do not know. In fact we haven't been into space. If anyone says otherwise it is not true. "
Basically with that the interview ends. "
23 Feb 2020 18:06:46
If what Gunnar Heinsohn said is true, which considering him being a professor emeritus of University of Bremen, is very likely. Then it makes perfect sense to me.
It's a simple concept but the fact that these layers are on the same level, says everything. Then you have the buildings / art etc all looking the same.
What is it they are so scared of people knowing by adding in seven centuries? . Or is it something to do with hiding the true date?
Its a shame Gunnar didn't release some books in English. His concept is straightforward, easy to understand and research compared to the crazy complex studies of Fomenko.
There doesn't appear to be anything more in English from Gunnar either in video or book, but if you happen to see anymore, I'd be interested to watch / read.
I guess I could try and find a PDF of one of his books and use Google translator.
Read discussionIf what Gunnar Heinsohn said is true, which considering him being a professor emeritus of University of Bremen, is very likely. Then it makes perfect sense to me.
It's a simple concept but the fact that these layers are on the same level, says everything. Then you have the buildings / art etc all looking the same.
What is it they are so scared of people knowing by adding in seven centuries? . Or is it something to do with hiding the true date?
Its a shame Gunnar didn't release some books in English. His concept is straightforward, easy to understand and research compared to the crazy complex studies of Fomenko.
There doesn't appear to be anything more in English from Gunnar either in video or book, but if you happen to see anymore, I'd be interested to watch / read.
I guess I could try and find a PDF of one of his books and use Google translator.
23 Feb 2020 15:16:59
Big c
Lol what a load of waffle.
At least put an a fake terror attack in there.
And what did u stick your pages together with! ?
Sorry u get so wound up by the flat earth conspiracy dude.
But when u actually look at the evidence that can not be messed with.
That this place ain't muffin shaped but, a perfect ball u see in images
That ain't cgi.
There not much left
Anyway people can speak or question what they like without someone jumping in with stick tabs .
Take it easy.
Read discussionBig c
Lol what a load of waffle.
At least put an a fake terror attack in there.
And what did u stick your pages together with! ?
Sorry u get so wound up by the flat earth conspiracy dude.
But when u actually look at the evidence that can not be messed with.
That this place ain't muffin shaped but, a perfect ball u see in images
That ain't cgi.
There not much left
Anyway people can speak or question what they like without someone jumping in with stick tabs .
Take it easy.
23 Feb 2020 14:39:17
But the gases and plasma is a good explanation as well.
Read discussionBut the gases and plasma is a good explanation as well.
23 Feb 2020 14:38:28
Good post SM,
I could go into a daze all day looking at the northern lights lol.
But In regards to the topic, led lights use certain wavelength to obtain a blue or red or yellow light 660nm and so on.
Maybe everything is like a hand scanner in a shop. Its programme is trained on picking up wavelengths and frequencies to make us see light feel warmth and so on like the matrix showed.
Read discussionGood post SM,
I could go into a daze all day looking at the northern lights lol.
But In regards to the topic, led lights use certain wavelength to obtain a blue or red or yellow light 660nm and so on.
Maybe everything is like a hand scanner in a shop. Its programme is trained on picking up wavelengths and frequencies to make us see light feel warmth and so on like the matrix showed.
23 Feb 2020 14:28:54
Yes it does seem that way ed33,
from bits and pieces I've seen on the subject.
who knows that's what makes it interesting.
Read discussionYes it does seem that way ed33,
from bits and pieces I've seen on the subject.
who knows that's what makes it interesting.
23 Feb 2020 13:57:00
I think in my opinion they do it for the illusion of height and curve
Ed33.
I mean they say u got to be so high to see curve and the fish eye lense assist them with this.
I also watch a interesting YouTube video going into the shape of our eyes and how this makes us see curve
The way we do .
Read discussionI think in my opinion they do it for the illusion of height and curve
Ed33.
I mean they say u got to be so high to see curve and the fish eye lense assist them with this.
I also watch a interesting YouTube video going into the shape of our eyes and how this makes us see curve
The way we do .