Latest replies

Reply · growbun28 · 07 Oct 2015 00:11
07 Oct 2015 01:05:20
Sorry ed. looks like it's been heavily burned at the point of death then buried in a shallow grave later to be exhumed. But further tests would clarify any discrepancies. Was this found in Asia? Could be the Asian chupacabra. There was creatures found like this in Mexico wasn't there
Read discussion
Reply · growbun28 · 06 Oct 2015 23:41
07 Oct 2015 00:38:24
Well I have had a look! Does Janet Jackson know that they have exhumed her brother. Definitely weird
Read discussion
Reply · CTR · 06 Oct 2015 22:36
06 Oct 2015 23:26:55
That is strange!

Was there more tests done on this? It could it be some kind of crazy birth marks? If not it's very odd.

It's does look like it has scales.
Read discussion
Reply · CTR · 06 Oct 2015 22:23
06 Oct 2015 23:19:17
Hi guys thanks for replying.

I agree with the view that if he was really dangerous he would of gone 'missing' years ago.
Read discussion
Reply · frankyscouser · 06 Oct 2015 22:04
06 Oct 2015 23:01:24
snowdon intel has always been available, the fact that now you have a guy that worked for the CIA and is now gone public to MSM and saying "hey guys look at this" that's what made the news not any revelations.

i think he was a shill, as soon as this came out what happened?
we get new laws passed ranging from snooping to people getting arrested without a trial and like you guys have mentioned, if he was the real deal he would either be dead or mind controlled like a true whistleblower hero, Bradley Manning.

Manning caused more of a stink because it was classified and came out at a sensitive time in iraq/afganistan.

i also include Julian Assange as a true whistleblower that one day will pay the price for his beliefs in freedom of speech.
Read discussion
Reply · KimPhilby · 06 Oct 2015 21:22
06 Oct 2015 22:11:04
Depends on the context. Maybe its like the Kennedy assassination, people have spent 50 years talking about 2nd or 3rd shooters, the grassy knoll etc. But no one asks the important questions. Maybe the same with 911.

As for Snowden. I'm undecided. I agree with the editor if they wanted him dead they could accomplish it. Although once in Russia and in the hands of Moscow centre they'd have a job. But he's the best coup the centre has managed in 20 years. The Intel he's provided has been the real deal. And some of the stuff leaked has been highly damaging for Washington. I can't see them shooting themselves in the feet like that.
Read discussion
Reply · frankyscouser · 06 Oct 2015 19:33
06 Oct 2015 19:30:50
the only thing that surprises me is we don't see more of these genetic cross breeds
Read discussion
Reply · TTTS · 06 Oct 2015 19:33
06 Oct 2015 19:44:00
What is that? Some kind of genetic experiment?
Read discussion
Reply · HoneyBadger · 06 Oct 2015 17:18
06 Oct 2015 17:43:58
Couldn't agree more, those rich lists with Bill Gates and Warren Buffet on top really are a hoot! Most likely those guys are puppets for the big boys.
Read discussion
Reply · HoneyBadger · 06 Oct 2015 17:18
06 Oct 2015 17:42:25
Kim,
You would know a lot more than me about that kind of thing so I take your point and thanks for the info.
Coming from more of a point of ignorance I have to rely on gut instinct a lot of the time, trying to read between the lines of what is said etc.
Assange quote on 9/11
"I'm constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud."
I have real trouble putting trust in anyone who has researched 9/11 only to arrive at this conclusion, let alone someone of his background putting this message out.
Some of his supposed views scream controlled opposition to me.
Read discussion
Reply · frankyscouser · 06 Oct 2015 16:41
06 Oct 2015 17:31:42
the vibe I got before he went quiet was, he was genuinely concerned about his grandchild with the threat about social services, which I can understand.
Read discussion
Reply · Supasub · 06 Oct 2015 16:41
06 Oct 2015 17:24:05
I'd say Putin must be right up there now even though you won't get to the bottom of his wealth.
Read discussion
Reply · frankyscouser · 06 Oct 2015 16:41
06 Oct 2015 17:24:29
haha I seen that article ,the monarchy still own lands all over the world ,even thou the commonwealth countries have independence they still own lands , also read she owns thousands of acres by denver airport.
Read discussion
Reply · KimPhilby · 06 Oct 2015 16:41
06 Oct 2015 17:26:03
There also the largest land owners in Britain. Not to mention the foreign land portfolio, the shares, art collections.
Read discussion
Reply · OnlyoneManUtd · 06 Oct 2015 15:41
06 Oct 2015 16:26:14
Yeah, never thought of that. Who would you put as the richest, I'm sure it won't be Bill gates or any of the others that the media would have us believe. I wonder just how much the royal family are really worth. I'm sure they would still own a lot of foreighn land.
Read discussion
Reply · zari · 06 Oct 2015 15:11
06 Oct 2015 16:10:23
I'm not sure how genocide comes into this Kim. That's an emotionally charged word used by the establishment to distinguish the murder of certain groups of people as more important than that of others.

As for the last paragraph of my last post, I was sharing a calculation.
The majority of administration and policy setting buildings are located within a two square mile radius thanks to their masonic designers. There are about 10.000 people working in each of those centers. Multiplied by the number of those centers with global influence that would be about 120.000 people.
I guarantee you that if there is full scale military action in Syria i.e. air strikes, navy bombardments, shell bombings, large troop deployments etc. the death toll will far exceed that rough estimate.

As evident by the aftermath of the military intervention in Iraq, five million Iraqis were murdered so the west could dethrone Saddam, who they placed in power in the first place, and establish a free and democratic Iraq, as always only in name. If we really crave military action we should point our weapons to ourselves. At least then when we claim that we care about preserving human lives it wouldn't be empty rhetoric but reproducible mathematical calculations.

Furthermore we can safely assume that once Syria has been "liberated" Iran will follow. The same rhetoric will be used there and the same excuses will be voiced again. Once north Africa has been westernized (read bowed to the same interests driving the west) we will hear nothing of the annihilation of the rest of that continent, which has been well under way for some time now.

These wars are waged so we can spread the totalitarian establishment virus. The fact that we are spurred on by the same simple rhetoric and then proceed to provide our support because we choose to remain oblivious to the truth would make this a tragedy. Our immaturity as a species will bring forth our self-destruction. Intelligent beings solve their problems through dialogue. Only beasts do so in battle.
Read discussion
Reply · HoneyBadger · 06 Oct 2015 14:43
06 Oct 2015 15:16:14
All seems plausible to me Ed033. Like I said I've not visited the site so much recently, when I get a chance to review his recent content more closely I'll come back and give my opinion.
Read discussion
Create New Post

Create New Post

Please log in to create a new post.

Posts appear after editor approval.