Talk Sense

Message from the editors

Disclaimer: Please note that the content on this site is for informational and entertainment purposes only and should not be taken as anything else such as qualified professional advice. Anyone on this site seeking any advice should consult a qualified professional. This site's owner/creators cannot vouch for the veracity of the content on this site and are not liable for any risks or issues associated with using or acting upon the information on this site.

Discussion #9316Talk Sense

14 Oct 2015 20:45:50
a powerful 8 minute video on the real truth of SYRIA.

War Of Deception - Ken O'keefe on PressTv

 

TTTS
14 Oct 2015 21:08:31
Ive watched that Frank, the Washington stogie doesn't know what way to turn. Wonderful interview.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #11992Talk Sense

13 Oct 2015 22:37:52
Hi Ed, you mentioned a grouping /person/being higher up the food chain than the Rothschilds / Rockefeller clans. Do you mind shedding some light on this?

 

{Ed033's Note - it goes back to the idea that the Rothschilds / Rockefellers care about themselves and a concept that people can't seem to get into their heads, which is why are the Elite killing / ruining everything on Earth now, because they would only be killing / ruining themselves.

The Royalty / Rothschilds / Rockefellers aren't at the top. They are like middle management types who can make 'side' deals of their own. i don't know who is at the top but it isn't those that care about themselves. i wrote earlier on this subject if you want to read it.

why do the elite ruin the earth
TTTS
14 Oct 2015 21:06:50
Quite a read, only today we have a maor underwater earthquake causing major causalities in Indian Ocean. The control of natural disasters maybe?
{Ed033's Note - Who knows? Did you watch the Dane Wigington video presentation on the page as that gives more info?
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
TTTS
14 Oct 2015 21:30:08
I'm about to plug in the earphones and watch, will comment later.
{Ed033's Note - ok great, thanks.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
TTTS
14 Oct 2015 22:17:51
Really seems that we've run out of time. To reverse the damage would take a movement from mainstream governing on a global scale. Where would such leadership come from taking into account the fact that the leaders that aren't owned receive the "he's a crackpot" from the MSM.
{Ed033's Note - While we the people are comfortable, nothing is going to happen at all. i think more and more people will have no job and therefore will be completely dependant on government handouts that will be borrowed from we the people from infinity into the future. When governments can no longer borrow infinite amounts money from infinity into the future to give to people to keep them comfortable, then we'll see a population wake up but it will be too late then.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
TTTS
15 Oct 2015 20:11:36
Philippines are expecting up to 1m of rain over 4 days and 160 mph winds. Never heard of a rainfall like that before. About 10mm per hr. Thousands in danger I'd imagine.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #2411Talk Sense

13 Oct 2015 13:44:14
Hey guys, I just read an article on MSN news, the UK government are talking about legalizing cannabis to generate tax revenue. If you ask me that's the wrong reason to legalize it, maybe if it was for medical reasons I would accept it easier. i sometimes use cannabis I'm not against it just speaking morally. I've seen some posts about cannabis in some posts hope this interest's you guys. What's your opinion on this matter?

frankyscouser
13 Oct 2015 14:47:31
my mum takes it for medicinal purpose and I would vote for it. am skeptical if it was not spiked with something though.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
KimPhilby
13 Oct 2015 15:58:26
In order to sell it the usual tory interests it won't work by saying its medicinal. But by saying its for tax raising then they'll be able to sell it as a policy. Especially if the tax money goes on various other tory policies. And if they have notice to buy shares in whichever companies get the licences.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
growbun28
13 Oct 2015 21:14:23
Honestly the whole lot of it is bollocks! They should legalise the lot and provide clean safe drugs and get rid of the underground. People want drugs they get them and all the money wasted on trying to police it is obviously not working. And as for medicinal benefits you get psylocin that helps depression, mdma for ptsd (proved) shulgin work on it for the American government and you also have iboga that is pretty much bomb proof for treating addiction.

But then where would the profit be if they didn't sell subitex and methadone, it really is all a crock of crap. Sugar and added salt are more dangerous than most of the illegal substances fact, and we let our kids feast on it.
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
defender of humanity
14 Oct 2015 00:08:55
Even if its legal the underground black market won't go away they'll keep on selling guns, ammunition and drugs. Its a real problem in Glasgow were I'm from so many wannabe gangsters wanna make there mark on the city. Back to the point when I was in Amsterdam the government regulated cannabis cafes were extortionate for weed. The locals there still use underworld drug dealers because there product is cheaper than the cafes. I think the same would happen here unfortunately.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Melbourne CFC
14 Oct 2015 07:28:55
How in the world would the underground black market still sell drugs, if the price and quality was cheaper through regulation, and access would be easy as there would be shops selling them?

Think before you type mate.

Spot on growbun, the war on drugs worked about as well if not worse then whatthe current war on terror will.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

Read all 10 replies

Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #2410Talk Sense

13 Oct 2015 13:06:53
@edd33, you said in a previous post down the page that you were going to expand your consciousness, I'm also in to that. What activities are good for expanding your consciousness?

 

{Ed033's Note - i never said, i was going to expand my consciousness. i have no idea how to do that except for gaining more knowledge. Maybe others have an idea how to expand consciousness.
KimPhilby
13 Oct 2015 15:58:50
I prefer vodka, classical music and a good book.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
HoneyBadger
13 Oct 2015 17:17:33
Think it was Melbourne who said that. Hallucagenics, reading, meditation who knows?

I've only recently discovered my fondness for classical music Kim, and have to say it helps me drift away into distant thoughts a lot more effectively than modern pop music etc. Something more primal about it. I also like to listen to the odd piece of chanting or tribal music if I feel the need to be at one with myself and to have a good think.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Melbourne CFC
13 Oct 2015 18:02:03
By far the most effective way to expand your consciousness is through the use of plants. Psilocybin mushrooms are great tools to help shed ego and explore your consciousness, but aren't for everyone. If you manage your consciousness well on a day to day basis, they will bring you nothing but clarity and perspective. Shouldn't be abused and I recommend use only when you need an objective look at life, or when wanting to explore your consciousness.

Other tools include meditation, floatation tanks, sensory deprevation tanks, forms of yoga and mindfulness. All take different levels of mastering but all have massive benefits. My suggestion if you choose to use plants is to be in a safe dark environment, maybe your room, with a smallish dose (2-3 grams).
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
KimPhilby
13 Oct 2015 18:17:09
Yes classical is so much better. Also Chinese music and one time I was out shopping and there were some native Americans possibly Navajo doing dome street performance. Very relaxing music and chanting. I'll pass on the drugs though.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
HoneyBadger
13 Oct 2015 18:33:22
Will have to check out some Chinese music when I get the chance then.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

Read all 17 replies

Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #9693Talk Sense

13 Oct 2015 09:44:14
Hey guys/ladies and eds, i've been reading an interesting book titled Alien Interview which the author says he received official transcripts of an interview of one of the aliens captured at Roswell by a U.S millitary nurse.
The book is mind blowing to say the least and the information given by the alien is very eye opening.
I wonder who has read the book or if you can i'd totally recommend it. It is relatively short and archived in some sites. Would appreciate any feedback.

 

frankyscouser
13 Oct 2015 10:50:27
not read the book but have heard about it and heard or read some transcripts online, will let you know more what I think once I have more time mate.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
defender of humanity
13 Oct 2015 11:05:36
Not read the book but i've read about the alien interview. I personally think its a lie. I also think that any aliens that were found at Roswell were dead because of all the alien autopsy documents. Also how would they communicate with humans in my opinion telekinesis is the easy answer and probably not true. If they were to communicate with us I think it would be with symbols like crop circles or the Nazca lines in the desert. plus I'm sure the government made a lot of disinformation agents to warp and conflict with each others stories. Just my opinion guys.
{Ed033's Note - i have read the book and it would be easy for anyone who is into the alternative info movement to make all this up. i'm not saying the author made any of it up, its most likely that the author was given made up info.

Let's just say the ET did give this story, is it possible that a captured ET is going to make something up? If this info is from the military, isn't it most likely that it is dis-info because that's what the military gives out?

The information is far fetched but possible. When you weigh up the probabilities, it's way more likely imo to be disinfo than truth.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #2409Talk Sense

13 Oct 2015 07:39:10
Hi guys, I read an article that suggests that violent video games make people want to commit acts of violence.as a gamer I disagree, I think that most people (not all) are smart enough to not be influenced by any game. What do you guys think?

 

{Ed001's Note - it depends on the person, like drugs or alcohol, the effects vary from person to person. Those that actually are influenced are being influenced because of other problems they have, which would make them prone to acts of violence anyway. Same as films and books, they influence as much as we allow them to.}
MS85
13 Oct 2015 08:20:35
I'm a big gamer also. I think it comes down to individual mindsets though. anything can be influential to anyone good or bad, its not to say video games solely are to blame for all the dramas in the world but I bet in the odd occasion they are the root cause.
{Ed001's Note - so you wouldn't say the root cause was the person? I would say it was problems in their upbringing that caused it far more than the games. It seems to me that mostly it is people desperately trying to find something to blame rather than admit it is society that is the major root cause. Parents not caring, bullying at school, schools being useless, lack of a real community etc are far more of a cause of violence than the video games they play.}
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
defender of humanity
13 Oct 2015 08:31:18
That's very true ed, didn't look at from that perspective thanks for all you guys insight.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Geordiesteve
13 Oct 2015 09:32:39
There was a huge debate when GTA 4 (iirc) came out when Devin Moore shot his way through a police station after stealing the gun from an officer; he then stole a police car and was caught after a car chase (much like the game he'd been playing non-stop). After being caught, he s something along the lines of "Life's a video game, you got to die sometime". This sparked a battle in the courts between Rockstar and Jack Thompson about whether or not the game caused this. I'd recommend watching Gamechangers as it is all about this. Should be on iPlayer as was pretty recent.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
MS85
13 Oct 2015 11:48:51
No Ed of course its down to the person, sorry I didn't come across clear. I was trying to say about influences and how they can affect peoples judgements be it good or bad.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
growbun28
14 Oct 2015 18:18:00
I think that video games are a bit of an easy target because it seems more obvious that it could create behaviour problems, but in reality there a lots of things that can cause these problems and most of them are very subliminal. Most kids in my opinion copy other kids and try and fit in just depends on how impressionable they are. I used to love Mario and all that fly agaric chomping didn't influence me at all lol. I'd seen some 'expert' in his mid 60's giving his ten peneth in on the evils of bloody minecraft ffs he thought that kids now want to turn themselves into heavily pixilated blocks and fly through the sky looking for an ender dragon. He obviously didn't watch magic roundabout in his early days and probably watched re runs of captain pugwash instead, I hope he didn't call any of his kids Rodger
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #11991Talk Sense

12 Oct 2015 16:36:11
Life expectancy can be prolonged by up to 60% by removing 238 genes.

The scientists stressed it could be successful in humans after 10 years research in Washington university.


goo.gl/azTfjv

 

KimPhilby
12 Oct 2015 20:53:19
Explains the royal family
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
TTTS
12 Oct 2015 21:45:22
Indeed Kim, it has successfully been carried out on worms.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #9636Talk Sense

12 Oct 2015 03:29:49
Hi everyone. Not conspiracy related but I wanted to share anyway in case this testimony can help someone else who has been going through what I have recently. I have been a weed smoker for 12 years, and thought I would never quit. I even used to joke about how I would be an old man with a spliff hanging out my mouth. Anyway the last few weeks I have managed to do something I never thought I could never do and that is to quit smoking it.

I honestly think its the best decision I ever made. I am so much more clear headed, I can get up earlier without the need for 3 alarms, and I feel so much healthier and happier for it. The first week is admittedly very tough, but it gets easier. Anyway, if this is OK to be posted on here Eds I would appreciate it, as all people (myself included) tend to go on about these days is the positive side of smoking cannabis, and the negatives are rarely mentioned. Cheers, Jase

 

growbun28
12 Oct 2015 09:08:12
Well done jase!

I myself used to smoke weed and stopped because I started to work in oil and gas and you get tested! It was the best thing I ever did and I'm not anti weed it's horses for courses. The thing most people don't realise is that contrary to most idiots opinions on supper skunk etc and that people say that mind altering chems get put in weed, the real truth is that the chemical that does the damage is cbd which is higher in content in indica strains. What has been happening is that there is no commercial value in growing sativa strains because they take 12 weeks plus to flower and have small yields but they grow dead talk and indicas are short and bushy and can grow in 8 weeks with a heavy yield. So they got cross bred and hey ho you get tell bushey fast growing heavy yielding plants that are very cbd heavy which produced couch lock. Plants that are high in thc and no cbd are very uplifting .

For me as I got older and started getting responsibility so found it best to stay away and like yourself I'm happier for it 😀
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
Supasub
12 Oct 2015 09:18:21
I stopped years ago along with other substances. My most severe bouts of psychosis were whilst I was smoking cannabis in my late teens, early twenties. Doing a lot of cocaine nearly everyday for a few years in my mid twenties after my mother died (although not a reason to justify my use) was also my lowest and darkest period. You have no way of knowing what you are taking these days either as all is virtually chemically tampered with. What gets my goat now is the legal highs. I don't understand why any chemical substance is not illegal to begin with. Some of the legal highs have the similar make up to crystal meth for instance. My children are growing up fast and it does start to worry me what they might come across as there will always be a friend at some point who dabbles eventually. All I can do is try and educate them as best I can.
Agree · 3 · Disagree · 0
Leahy12
12 Oct 2015 11:03:25
Lads that's great that ye moved on from it. i smoked a bit in my younger years when I was out in the clubbing scene and doing a few parties, now I wasn't hooked or anything, but now I have 3 daughters heading for their teen years I worry about them as drugs are everywhere even in schools,it would be great for any young posters on here if ye lads could tell them about the dark side of things, like not been able to get up for work, not able to function properly.

i know a few lads that say they were depressed, paranoid. I know another bloke who lost his job and now stays indoors most of the time, they should have ex-users going round to schools sharing their bad experiences. I grew up with a lad who was a gifted footballer, had trials at a few big clubs,but he couldn't get away from drink and drugs, he is just after hitting 40 now and says it was the biggest regret of his life, cheers boys thanks for sharing.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
HoneyBadger
12 Oct 2015 11:49:50
Thanks for this thread and well done Jase.

I've smoked daily for around 15 years and have loved the majority of my experiences. But although I'm quite liberal in terms of my views on decriminalization and the benefits etc I have to admit that its become more than a habit over the years. Like any substance it can be damaging if the user struggles to control it. The negatives for me are a lack of energy and desire to get out of the house as well as getting up groggy and of course the health issues linked with smoking in general.

I've wanted to cut down or quit for a while now. time for another shot I think using this thread as my inspiration.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
MS85
12 Oct 2015 12:46:27
for 15 years I was smoking every day. Pretty much knockewhen my first child was born. now maybe have a Joint a month as still enjoy being high from time to time. its all about moderation and in my heyday I just couldn't stop myself. I was an addict! I've done a lot of other drugs but Weed wae only one I was badly addicted to. used to grow the odd plan and send home loads in the post to myself on visits to Dam. now I look back and think what an idiot. I have a pretty successful career and could of blown it all for a small bit of green!
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0

Read all 22 replies

Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #2364Talk Sense

11 Oct 2015 19:20:27
Today my mum sent me a few links to a stand up comic named Bill Hicks.

That bloke knew what was up.

If anyone hasn't heard of him go check him out. Sadly he died a while back but it shows people were wise to America and there ways years ago.

 

Melbourne CFC
11 Oct 2015 22:01:32
You should check out George Carlin mate. That bloke knew what was up and was from around the same time as Hicks.

You'll find a lot of other comics that could see the world for what it was/is if you search youtube
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #9493Talk Sense

11 Oct 2015 17:54:39
I was listening to one of my favourite music albums today and thought wow, insight into how things will be in the future, scary stuff.

Pink Floyd - 1973
Us and them
And after all we're only ordinary men
Me, and you
God only knows it's not what we would choose to do
Forward he cried from the rear and the front rank died
And the General sat, as the lines on the map moved from side to side
Black and Blue
And who knows which is which and who is who
Up and Down
And in the end it's only round and round and round
Haven't you heard it's a battle of words
the poster bearer cried
Listen son, said the man with the gun
There's room for you inside

"Well I mean, they're going to kill ya, so like, if you give 'em a quick sh. short, sharp shock, they don't do it again.
Dig it? I mean he got off light, 'cause I coulda given 'I'm a thrashin' but I only hit him once.
It's only the difference between right and wrong innit? I mean good manners don't cost nothing do they, eh?"

Down and Out
It can't be helped but there's a lot of it about
With, without
And who'll deny that's what the fightings all about
Get out of the way, it's a busy day
And I've got things on my mind
For want of the price of tea and a slice
The old man died.

 

frankyscouser
12 Oct 2015 19:05:13
not a floyd fan but I love roger waters' stance over the middle east and gaza.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
HERBIE
12 Oct 2015 22:54:56
Yes your right about Waters, he really does try to highlight the Palastinian genocide, he is an intelligent man without a doubt.
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #2363Talk Sense

11 Oct 2015 11:05:42
Recently I watched the documentary called 9/11 the new pearl harbour.

Got me thinking about good old lucky Larry.

Now how anyone can't see this man was not directly involved in knowing the events were going to happen is beyond me.

So my question is, why was he used to buy the towers and at what benefit to those who told him?

The towers were full of asbestos and needed to spend well over a billion to sort them out or 100's of millions a year to keep them safe.
They had recently lost a court case to have the insurance companies pay for it and then lo and behold! an attack costs the insurance companies nearly 5 billion.

Not bad work for 3 months for lucky Larry.

 

HERBIE
11 Oct 2015 18:08:43
The scary thing about it is the whole world knows this was an inside job but completely ignores it.
There is no answer to the question because there is no questions been asked about it.
Ignorance is bliss.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #5146Talk Sense

11 Oct 2015 10:33:28
{Ed033's Note - The following is a bigger picture look at things for those that might be interested. 

In 1666 Britain was officially taken over by a corporation (with shareholders) which replaced any type of 'administration/government' we had. 

When this corporation took over, they brought with them their version of a legal system and their version of a language called legalese and in 1666 while their agents were burning down the [rat infested/disease ridden] London to remove the people that were living there and give them a cleared location to do business (now called the City Of London) and a another cleared area they could create a new modern city in we call London, this corporation's agents in parliament declared everyone who was living here, dead and 'lost beyond the seas'. 

Now with no one living in here, their legal system could perform a salvage operation on this country and all the proceeds from this salvage operation could go to the shareholders of the corporation. This salvage operation is still going on today. Everything the government and the legal system does is to benefit the shareholders of this corporation that took over. 

All what we the people owned, all the natural resources and anything we the people pay for are supposed to be held in trust by a lawful 'administration/government' for we the people's benefit. If any natural resource was to be sold, then we the people (who were born here and therefore are the beneficiaries) should be given an equal share each of any profits. 

But because this corporation's legal system/government doesn't recognise we the people, then the corporation's shareholders get the money. 

Politicians and all public/civil servants/ employees (persons who work for the corporation/government) should be working for we the people but it's obvious they don't. Why not? Because they're working for the shareholders of this corporation, whether they know it or not. 

The government creates legislation to serve the shareholders of the corporation not to benefit we the people. 

What the FUQ documentary, which shows the above in action



 

Melbourne CFC
11 Oct 2015 16:59:59
This doco was the thing that opened my eyes to the fact the "Government" is actually a corporation. I think you first posted it 3-4 years ago Ed. Such a good watch.

Also, for any Australians reading the site, remember that as of 12:01am Tuesday, the Government's new data collection legislation comes into play. Although they have most likely been doing it for some years now already, just be careful with future use of smart phones and computers. I'm going back to the flip phone for most of my daily life stuff. Not because I engage in anything 'illegal', but because I still value some level of privacy in my life.

Will also be moving overseas and off the grid in 6 months time, to a nice, warm beach where I'm able to partake in consciousness expanding activities for a while.
{Ed033's Note - Sounds great, good luck Melbourne
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Create a new post

Log in or register to post.

Create New Post

Create New Post

Please log in to create a new post.

Posts appear after editor approval.