Talk Sense

Use our posting form to send us your post.

Disclaimer: Please note that the content on this site is for informational and entertainment purposes only and should not be taken as anything else such as qualified professional advice. Anyone on this site seeking any advice should consult a qualified professional. This site's owner/creators cannot vouch for the veracity of the content on this site and are not liable for any risks or issues associated with using or acting upon the information on this site.

21 Jun 2025 20:58:50
UNLIMITED Heat For Your Home | NO ELECTRIC NEEDED

Agree0

15 Nov 2025 06:35:16
Scaliger Chronology: The "Divine" Chronology of the Church Fathers

Agree0

14 Nov 2025 21:42:55
It is a puzzling thing.

I have never seen any graves dated before, in my experince, the 1800's. I am sure there maybe a few older than that, but where are ALL the people before this point buried??

Yes, you have these catacombs beneath some cities. Paris being a predominant one. This doesn't mean that's where they all are and add up at all. There are a lot of suggestions graveyards were upheaved and the remains moved to these places but the numbers genuinely do not add up.

Where are all the ancient/old- pre 1700's dead buried? Churches in the UK date to 1000 - 1400 AD. Where are all the 1400AD buried? I guess the raptured has happened already.

How many people, or rather slaves, are alleged to build the pyramids? where are their remains.

Yet we find remains of 65 million year old alleged reptiles?

That makes sense? or does it?

We are here to talk sense, right?

Then let's talk.....

PS..
Did someone mention MudFlood/Reset/Cabbagepatch babies/Orphan Trains/ Old World Tartaria....Everything we are told is truth is a lie????

We would be living on Mars by now but when we went to the Moon it was so Meh, we destroyed all the data to go there again.

No, it is OK now. Elon goes down and gives. The greatest trick ever played is the fact he will call you again. The devil in plain site wants your praise. It looks so fake, it has to be real.

Agree0

15 Nov 2025 14:07:28
1. it seems that there was some kind of 'mud flood' maybe late 1700s/very early 1800s, which could have buried pre 1800 gravestones.

2. I think there are a few allegedly purported to be pre 1800 i.e. late 1700s gravestones in a few graveyards in this country and probably in Europe.

3. As we have in at least the 'western world', built higher above earlier time periods, 1600s, 1800s, then possibly the graves got buried when we built higher?

4. I have heard that in Europe there are no trees older than 200 years old? (according to tree ring studies).

{Ed032's Note - 1. I am in agreement with this. The problem before us is the churches are dated (allegedly) back to 1000-1100AD. Either the dating of these sites is wrong (see Fomenko chronology) or no one before circa 1700 was buried in a grave ( so why have a church graveyard??)

2. There probably are a few 1700 graves. Was no one before this buried in a churchyard?

3. The 'truth' is most definitely buried and the gatekeepers keep it so only the 'skooled' can dig.

4. Are there any trees left in this Realm known as Earth? I can only see bushes and shrubs.

The Elm shrub, known for its slow growth, has alleged examples of over 200 years. I am growing one myself, and I admit I am training it as it will become a bonsai specimen, but it is over 10 years now and still the size of my hand or maybe a tad bigger.

This being said, you have no argument from me that the dating of things is controlled.

Are you able to share the ring studies? I miss my precious.

Agree0

15 Nov 2025 22:16:38
Maybe 'churches' originally didn't have graveyards until the agenda was to cover up what's around 'churches'?

4. No, as i only heard it in a youtube video, when i first heard the Fomenko info.

{Ed032's Note - You mean cymatic healing centres had no dead, so there was no need to bury anyone?

Agree0

14 Nov 2025 19:51:20
The Internet, Waking Up Religion and Getting Offended with Guy Anderson

Agree0

14 Nov 2025 21:09:38
I don't know, or rather doubt that many people watch this sites posts.

In this post they talk about many things, one of which is why the sea is salty?

There is no explanation for this. A few theories maybe, but nothing is fact. Much like most of the things in this Realm we are told to 'believe' is 'truth'!

Now, I don't know if you have watch the series "Unveiling a Titan" by Stellium7. Where he has studied Montgó Massif, a mountain and has legitimate evidence that suggests this is a fossilised titan (elephant) and as crazy as that may sound to a 'normie' I suggest you watch the series or even check the mountain out for yourself. Truth never hides and wants to be seen. (type in the search 'titan' or check out Stellium7 on YT, you may learn something?)

Could the oceans be salty from the residue of fallen epically-scaled titans and fallen giants being washed from fossilised remains by precipitation ? It is a logical thought, when you understand things.

You can believe your agenda led textbooks from being 'skooled' if that's where you want to reside. I myself seek the actual truth. The salty oceans have no explanation, and this could possibly be one. The truth is out there, but I am sure you would rather have your 'jab' to avoid the boogeyman.

Anyhow, don't worry. Santa will soon be on his way to give you everything you desire.

Sleep, you sheep, sleep. nothing to see here. Bahh humbug

Agree0

15 Nov 2025 14:09:52
Interesting, i assumed the sea was salty because the water on its journey from land to sea/ocean picked up salts from the ground/rocks/stones etc.

{Ed032's Note - If that was the case then you wouldn't get brackish waters at river estuaries. Would that not make rivers salty too? Then you have natural spring water emerging from the depths of the Earths rocks, that is also not salty although it does contain minerals. I know celtic sea salts contain 82 or 83 minerals but are those minerals coming from the fresh water springs?

The more you think about this the more confusing it gets.

Agree0

11 Nov 2025 10:05:55
"Deep within India's so-called "ancient caves, " a pattern begins to emerge - identical megalithic designs carved into volcanic cliffs hundreds of miles apart, melted facades that look more built than chiseled, and mysterious stone domes once connected to the ceilings as if part of a forgotten energy grid. These weren't temples for monks - they were palaces for a civilization far beyond anything we've been told, a world buried under mud and renamed to fit a new timeline. And when the first explorers "accidentally discovered" them in the 1800s, it may not have been an accident at all."